Re: udp retrieval protocol
[email protected] Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:02:05 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Lester Vecsey <[email protected]>: > From :http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html: > > -- > How should messages be identified? How should messages be downloaded? > Messages could be retrieved through HTTP, but an NFS/FSP-style UDP-based > protocol would be much more resistant to denial of service. > -- > > > A few of us would come up with these test servers and put some messages in > them, and write clients to talk to them, basically a set of unix utils that > talk to the server, I have recently gained access to a UML (user-mode Linux) hosting service and would be willing to donate a portion of its capacity/bandwidth for a testbed. For those of you not familiar with UML, it is basically a kernel that runs in user space, and allows multiple incarnations on a single physical box (frequently used in honeypot traps). We can attempt to simulate traffic flows between several virtual mailstores, even implement different protocols to evaluate which are the common features (which goes into a RFC) and which can be specific implementations (for those inclined to wander down the commercialisation path). The only sticking point is that it will have to comply with the Australian spam legislation (which IMHO actually maps nicely onto IM2000 as it requires authorisation before any actual sending). Lawrence