Sender authentication (was: CAPTCHA over smtp...)
"R. Armiento" <[email protected]> Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:19:19 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian Candler wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:10:29AM +0100, R. Armiento wrote: >> Well, if you are prepared to live with this solution you can already use >> a simple white list on the [unauthenticated] sender address. > > [...] the MAIL FROM:<...> envelope you see does not necessarily bear a > direct relationship to the address on your whitelist. I would suggest to do this filtering on the From-header in the email rather than the envelope from. This solution would likely give you a few years of peace before spammers catch on. After that, if you are lucky, email signatures will be more common than they are today. >> What I do not understand at all is why you would think making your >> friends send their emails using a BBS system or a new "passport-like >> service for identity brokers" will be any easier than getting them to >> install a simple MUA extension that just signs their outgoing emails. > > 1. The process is different for every MUAs. [...] > 2. Many/most webmail services don't support this. [...] > 3. People don't understand (or want to understand) the key management > lifecycle. [...] I still don't understand how you could create an "identity broker" system that wouldn't require just as big cooperation from your friends MUAs as signing outgoing emails. For the BBS example; to ask your friends to email you through a BBS user interface is just as intrusive as asking them to use a specific MUA when sending you emails. But I do agree to this concern: > When [your friends] replace their PC, they must remember to copy their > keying material across, otherwise they end up with new and untrusted keys. > When they work on multiple PCs, they must copy their keys onto every > machine, or generate new keys on each one and cross-certify them all. And so > on. However, I am not sure I agree that the "right" solution to this problem is to introduce a third party system (the "identity broker") and force me to send all my email through it... Best regards, Rickard