Re: CAPTCHA over smtp (yet another spam solution to discuss)

> >>You would never throw a party and invite more than two people?
> >
> >They really want to receive my e-mails.
> >
> >My parties are great.
>
> I guess your invitations are unsolicited.  If bulk is ">= 3," you are
> spamming your prospective guests.

Just a joke

>
> >> >>On the Internet, unless we're talking yesteryear's UUCP
> >> >>connections, you can approach anyone instantly.
> >> >
> >> >This is, from my point of view, not necesarily true.
> >>
> >>Example?
> >
> >When i send you an e-mail, you can be off-line :-)
>
> But an agent of mine will happily accept your email on my behalf.

Like an MTA? :-P

> [Greylisting]
> >This has little to do with being the sender who stores the mail.
>
> Greylisted senders have got to store greylisted messages in their output
> queues.

I meant, greylisting is not related with im2000.

Please, please, agree with me in something :-D

> >An open question: How could you avoid "ipv6 effect" in all this stuff?
> >
> >(being "ipv6 effect" the transition problem it is suffering)
>
> Send mail by completing, behind the scenes, a web form.  The web will
> transition to ipv6 smoothly, provided it ever will, won't it?
>

I tried to be sarcastic about ipv6 deployment.

I meant a transition plan from current e-mail and this C/R thingy :-P

> --Joachim
>