Re: chaffing and winnowing
Aaron Swartz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rickard Armiento wrote: > any government [c]ould easily outlaw this too Software to do winnowing and chaffing is easy to write. It might be as simple as: $ cat /dev/random | mconnect bob (assuming you had something like IPSEC to add a MAC to each packet and discard ones with bad MACs) I think it would be difficult to prevent people from sharing this command with each other. As the paper points out, outlawing execution of this command is also problematic: """ Charles' computer, for whatever reason, then adds ``chaff'' packets to the packet sequence from Alice to Bob. All of sudden, Charles' activities provide a very high degree of confidentiality for the communications between Alice and Bob! [...] One could imagine that Alice and Bob are merely authenticating their packets to each other, and that it is not Charles but instead a rogue law enforcement agent who is introducing the chaff, and then introducing the authenticated and chaffed message as potential justification to a judge [...] """ -- Aaron Swartz: http://www.aaronsw.com/ America must be disarmed.