Re: chaffing and winnowing

Aaron Swartz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.im2000
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Rickard Armiento wrote:
> any government  [c]ould easily outlaw this too

Software to do winnowing and chaffing is easy to write. It might be as 
simple as:

$ cat /dev/random | mconnect bob

(assuming you had something like IPSEC to add a MAC to each packet and 
discard ones with bad MACs)

I think it would be difficult to prevent people from sharing this 
command with each other.

As the paper points out, outlawing execution of this command is also 
problematic:

"""
Charles' computer, for whatever reason, then adds ``chaff'' packets to
the packet sequence from Alice to Bob.  All of sudden, Charles'
activities provide a very high degree of confidentiality for the
communications between Alice and Bob!
[...]
One could imagine that Alice and Bob are merely authenticating their
packets to each other, and that it is not Charles but instead a rogue
law enforcement agent who is introducing the chaff, and then
introducing the authenticated and chaffed message as potential
justification to a judge [...]
"""

-- 
Aaron Swartz: http://www.aaronsw.com/
America must be disarmed.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.