Re: The issue of mime parsing
"clemens fischer" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rickard Armiento <[email protected]>: > Stefan Karrmann: >> The data of an ISP-IM2000 for a message should be similar to >> [...some field details removed...] >> body_size (mandatory, unlimited) >> body (mandatory) >> [...some field details removed...] > > I guess you mean for the body to use MIME format to allow multipart > messages. This thread was started as I suggested there are > advantages to always handle body parts as external binary > files. (The primary advantage being simplifed handling of partial > message download for clients on low bandwith connections.) Are there > reasons to why you would like to avoid that approach? i think stefan leans toward letting MIME be a separate issue. he's talking about im2000 only headers here, with MIME beeing application or user data. clemens