Re: authentication & cash
"clemens fischer" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]>: > How should anonymous mail work in im2k? by using an anonymizer? such a message would cease to be an im2000 messages, but users would propably not expect to contract anything anonymously ... > In hashcash you have to spend some CPU cycles to get a collision of > k bits in n bits after applying a well known hash algorithm like > SHA. You don't have to run a suspicious program. If the receiver > wants cash that you are not willing to pay, the message will not be > delivered and im2k should inform you explicitly about this. to me this sounds like an empty loop on steroids. what is this used for? clemens