Re: Fwd: yet another alternative to im2000?

Bruno Wolff III <[email protected]>:

>>   http://www.pfir.org/tripoli-overview
>
> I read this and it was pretty vague. Their main point seemed to be
> that they could stop spam by using trusted third parties to sign
> mail server keys which could be used to sign messages. The proposed
> cure sounds worse than the disease.

yes, it seems to hint at X509.  i posted it because we had a
discussion on this list as to why providers and consumers should
bother to consider alternatives.  it seems people are getting aware of
the weaknesses of SMTP, even trying to design something better.

  clemens