Re: SPF is harmful. Adopt it.
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.im2000 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wack's Wicks Works |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
JCB> Why not create a protocol that allows for *each* message JCB> notification to include an optional resource identifier? Because malicious senders will always choose SMTP-based Internet mail. JCB> "I'm willing to store and later serve this message", or JCB> "I want you to store this message", or "I'll pay you $.05 JCB> to store this message", or "You'll pay me $.10 to store and JCB> later server this message, plus $.01 for each time you request JCB> it without accepting responsibility for it", etc. Oooh! Electronic postage stamps! I summon the spirit of John R. Levine! Can you hear me, O spirit? (Hint: Where it says on my IM2000 anti-UBM page that other anti-UBM measures have problems with the costs of enforcement, this is one of the measures that it is referring to.)