Re: Tempting change..

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Steffen Einsle wrote:
>i came to binc because its "lightweight", fast and easy setup. i never
>(!) use windows as a MTA, so Binc IMAP for windows is pointless for me,
>unicode is not for me either, and i'd prefer a small and quick
>implementation.

If you don't need anything other than what Binc IMAP 1.2 already provides,
then nobody is forcing you to move to 1.4. 1.2 will continue to be
actively maintained as long as Binc IMAP exists. But as with today, only
bugs are fixed.

The future of Binc IMAP requires general text codec support, a reduced
memory footprint, perhaps threading and perhaps plugins.

Andy :-)

--
Andreas Aardal Hanssen   | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg
Author of Binc IMAP      |  "It is better not to do something
http://www.bincimap.org/ |        than to do it poorly."