Re: binc 1.2 / Maildir++ depot
"Henry Baragar" <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:42:07 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.binc.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Instantiated Software Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:16:27 -0400, Jerry Lundström <[email protected]> wrote: > Recently we have been getting some serious problems with binc on our > imapservers. > > This isnt flame but why is binc restricted to creating mailboxes under > INBOX<delimiter> ? > > The most current problem is that ALL our new thunderbird clients can't > use Sent Drafts or Trash since they are common to be stored in the root > and not in INBOX.Sent . > See my response in a later message in this thread. > I've been trying to find some draft or rfc that explains the default > setup of IMAP/Maildir folders but I can't find anything like that, > everything i find says its up to the implementation do deside. > I am unclear of your meaning; this might clear things up: o IMAP is an Internet protocol defined by RFC: - see http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3501.html for the latest spec - it does not mention Maildir nor any other storage mechanisms - althought it obliquely refers to mbox format - it mandates exactly one folder, namely "INBOX" - it does not mandate the implementation of more than one folder - although it provides some rules if there is more than one o Maildir is a storage format that supports one folder o Maildir++ is a storage format that extends the Maildir format to support more than one folder - there are no standards for the organization Maildir++ folders o In general folder organization is mostly driven by the IMAP clients - the server may have restrictions on folder names and organization, but does not normally provide any folders beyond the one mandated by the RFC. > So my question is, what are the reasons for restricting mailboxes > outside INBOX/ ? > See my response in a later message in this thread. Henry:-) -- Henry Baragar Instantiated Software Inc. http://www.instantiated.ca