Re: [binc] What license should we use for Binc IMAP in the future?
Kyle Wheeler <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:37:24 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.binc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, August 5 at 02:11 PM, quoth Bob Van Zant:
> I certainly like the FreeBSD license. Can't get much more open than that. No
> one is forced to give back their modifications under any circumstances which
> makes a whole lot of sense.
Makes a whole lot of sense in what respect?
> The company I work for takes advantage of a lot of open source
> software and although it doesn't make any business sense to give back
> all of our changes to the open source world we do give back a lot of
> bug fixes and minor enhancements.
That's cool. Out of curiosity, what sorts of projects has your company
contributed to?
> We won't even look at GPL software.
Because you fear it, or...? I'm trying to understand the logic (or maybe
just the mentality).
~Kyle
--
There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury,
ammo. Use in that order.
-- Unknown
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 196 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iD8DBQBC+BbkBkIOoMqOI14RAjj1AJ4zgciq8AzEcxwSI7fSu14umEtvQgCfXRjC 475u+pfv3ozAs2X96XaVoE4= =voOo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----