Re: IPv6 recap

On Sat 06/Apr/2024 21:25:46 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Sam Varshavchik writes:
> 
> … and here's the patch.


There's something wrong with these patches.  The first complains it's malformed:

853-north:rfc1035$ patch -p2 < ~/pc/tmp/sam-patch-1
patching file rfc1035mxlist.c
patch: **** malformed patch at line 11: static int add_arecords(struct 
rfc1035_res *res, struct rfc1035_mxlist **list,

I added a space before "static", but then it complained again about the second 
next line (@@ -136).  The simplification is quite straightforward, so I carried 
it out by hand.  Even then, the second patch failed and I gave up.


854-north:rfc1035$ patch -p2 < ~/pc/tmp/sam-patch-2
patching file rfc1035mxlist.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 132.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 140.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 152.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 288.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file rfc1035mxlist.c.rej


I cannot find rfc1035mxlist.c on Github.  Do you have a copy there?


Best
Ale

> diff --git a/rfc1035/rfc1035mxlist.c b/rfc1035/rfc1035mxlist.c
> index cd08a111..10eb6203 100644
> --- a/rfc1035/rfc1035mxlist.c
> +++ b/rfc1035/rfc1035mxlist.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ static int harvest_records(struct rfc1035_res *res,
>      int q_type, int *found, int autoquery, int port);
> 
> #define    HARVEST_AUTOQUERY    1
> -#define    HARVEST_NODUPE        2
> 
> static int add_arecords(struct rfc1035_res *res, struct rfc1035_mxlist **list,
>              struct rfc1035_reply *mxreply,
> @@ -136,33 +135,33 @@ records weren't found.

-- 




_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users