Re: HAProxy and proxy protocol support

Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jun 2024 07:31:40 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.mail.imap.courier.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Andrew Athan writes:

> In short, I think your existing implementation is probably just fine, and I  
> would implement either a configurable or very short timeout for proxy v1  
> header reception per my prior note.

That's fair enough. I will leave it at that, and leave things alone, as they  
are now. I only thought about going the extra mile here. The claim from 6.1  
and in the netty write-up sounded odd to me. Odd but unambiguous, with only  
one possible explanation that I could think of. I still had the feeling  
that: this can't be true, but I couldn't find a way to interpret what I read  
any other way.

Thanks all.

_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)