Re: Really not prefer IPv6 MX
Sam Varshavchik <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Dec 2024 08:30:26 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.courier.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alessandro Vesely writes: > Hi Sam, > > as I have IPv6 addresses, I'd like to be able to (try to) send messages to > domains that have no IPv4 addresses. However, I have no chance to set up > reverse PTR, as my provider itself didn't claim its reverse zone. Hence, if > it's possible to use IPv4, I'd rather re-queue than use IPv6. > > I have ESMTP_PREFER_IPV6_MX=0 in courierd. It doesn't seem to have any > effect, as I introduced it after having fared without it for a while and > didn't see much difference (similar preference is probably driven by > gai.conf). I get sporadic rejects like so: How recent is the code you're running? There were some issues related to that which were fixed in 1.3.7, but having said that: ESMTP_PREFER_IPV6_MX=0 does not mean no IPv6 ever, it means that IPv4 is tried first before trying IPv6. So if there was a connection failure to the IPv4 address then the IPv6 address gets attempted, so in the outlined scenario you could still get an occasional failure, because of that. If you have a limited number of problematic domains you can try to put them into esmtproutes, as a bandaid. The best, long term solution would be to set aside an IPv4-only smarthost, and use esmtproutes to direct the problem domain to the smarthost. _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRupkKLJP96aW75pIOKYPgoojZS4gUCZ08H8gAKCRCKYPgoojZS 4qaSAP4vW4mptwr7UlscL6aoeHZf6fQaf2v5FIevOjt32VV1wAEAv6iOzRdQRDLb YafpxXPrQtzF6KljsivT5kkvAM0xuQs= =E8wj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----