Re: Cyrus IMAP on NFS

Eric Luyten via Info-cyrus <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.imap.cyrus
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 09/02/17 09:53, Paolo Cravero via Info-cyrus wrote:
>  From our storage admins: "One advantage of having most of the
> obsolete-but-keep-it-i-might-need-it-one-day data not on a local filesystem
> is that in the rare event of system crash you will not have to wait for fsck
> to complete, as it must be done for local disks. If you have TB's it makes
> quite a difference."
>
>
> Paolo
> (sitting on few NFS spools)


Go ZFS ?
We ditched fsck over a decade ago.

There used to be an Atos admin on this list who had a pretty impressive
Cyrus user base on NFS / NetApp and who was rather pleased with that.

Of course you would not put your mailboxes.db and other I/O critical
structures on NFS but why not the Cyrus metadata ?


Regards,
Eric (mail and storage admin, roughly 10 TB Cyrus spool on ZFS / iSCSI)

----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.