Re: Cyrus IMAP on NFS
Eric Luyten via Info-cyrus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.cyrus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09/02/17 09:53, Paolo Cravero via Info-cyrus wrote: > From our storage admins: "One advantage of having most of the > obsolete-but-keep-it-i-might-need-it-one-day data not on a local filesystem > is that in the rare event of system crash you will not have to wait for fsck > to complete, as it must be done for local disks. If you have TB's it makes > quite a difference." > > > Paolo > (sitting on few NFS spools) Go ZFS ? We ditched fsck over a decade ago. There used to be an Atos admin on this list who had a pretty impressive Cyrus user base on NFS / NetApp and who was rather pleased with that. Of course you would not put your mailboxes.db and other I/O critical structures on NFS but why not the Cyrus metadata ? Regards, Eric (mail and storage admin, roughly 10 TB Cyrus spool on ZFS / iSCSI) ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus