Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

Merlin Hartley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.imap.cyrus
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Just a quickie: Are you sure these mailboxes migrated properly?

M
--
Merlin Hartley
Computer Officer
MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit
Cambridge, CB2 0XY
United Kingdom

> On 23 Aug 2017, at 15:55, Gabriele Bulfon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I would add that both systems returns the same list of folders with :
> 
> . LIST "" %
> 
> including the "Other Users" :
> 
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
> * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archive
> ...
> * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
> 
> but then the java code just tries a "folder.list()" on each of them, to see for subfolders.
> Here the javamail code, before issuing the list command, tries the "checkExistance" using :
> 
> . LIST "" "Other Users"
> 
> and 3.0.2 returns an empty result.
> 
> Also trying by hand :
> 
> . LIST "Other Users" *
> 
> returns all the subtree on 2.4.12, while it's empty on 3.0.2.
> 
> Any idea?
> 
> Gabriele
> 
> 
> Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com <http://www.sonicle.com/>
> Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com <http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
> Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon <http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon>
> 
> 
> From: Gabriele Bulfon <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: August 23, 2017 4:41:36 PM CEST
> Subject: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I found a problem while scanning the imap tree through our java web app, behaving differently from a 2.4.12 to a 3.0.2 upgraded.
> Looking at the protocol I find these differences:
> 
> ==2.4.12==
> . LIST "" "Other Users"
> * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
> . OK Completed (0.000 secs 192 calls)
> 
> ==3.0.2==
> . LIST "" "Other Users"
> . OK Completed (0.000 secs)
> 
> So, what happens is that while the java code is checking existence of a folder in the tree, on 3.0.2 it receives an error.
> Systems are same, replicated, but one upgraded to 3.0.2, so imap base and configuration is the same, but for the 3.0.2 trimmings.
> 
> Is there any setting for compatibility in this case?
> 
> Thanx!
> Gabriele
> 
> Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com <http://www.sonicle.com/>
> Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com <http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
> Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon <http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon>
> ----
> Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
> List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
> To Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
> ----
> Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
> List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
> To Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.