Re: Sync_client or rsync/zfs

On 31.01.23 18:06, Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 30/01/2023 à 09:31:04+0100, Sven Schwedas a écrit
>> On 19.01.23 11:04, Albert Shih wrote:
>>> Jan 19 10:20:37 FQDN sync_client[56922]: Error in do_sync(): bailing out! The remote Server(s) denied the operation
>>> Jan 19 10:21:27 FQDN sync_client[56922]: MAILBOX received NO response: Unknown error
>>> Jan 19 10:21:27 FQDN sync_client[56922]: Error in do_sync(): bailing out! The remote Server(s) denied the operation
>>> Jan 19 10:21:39 FQDN sync_client[56922]: IOERROR: zero length response to MAILBOX (end of file reached)
>>> Jan 19 10:21:39 FQDN sync_client[56922]: Error in do_sync(): bailing out! Bad protocol
>>
>> What's in the slaves' logs when this happens?
> 
> Nothing special.

That does smell like a bug, but I guess it doesn't matter now.
> When I install the system the idea is to have both. But with time cyrus
> work fine .... but the sync.
> 
> So I'm thinking to drop the sync and just keep the zfs send/recv

It's what we've been doing for a few years now, and so far it has been 
working fine. We're taking and shipping snapshots every five minutes, 
that's fine with the users and keeps the performance impact minimal.

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1675240346-499553-1--