Re: upgrade to 3.2.1
Harald Leithner <leithner-pJld/xiOJTezZXS1Dc/[email protected]> Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:28:17 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.dbmail.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | ITronic |
| Message-ID | <op.xskq9fd7gbab7x@lord7> |
Hi, thanks for the updated upgrading.txt, I have some notices. You remove a part auf Upgrading DBMail from 2.2 to 3.0 and 3.0 to 3.1. Maybe it would be a good idea to create some footnote about these versions. because if you like to upgrade from 2.2 you will loose the information for the sql upgrade files that are needed until dbmail 3.2 thx for your work. Harald Am .01.2015, 20:26 Uhr, schrieb Lee Howard <[email protected]>: > Attached is a revision of UPGRADING that would have been clearer for me. > > I'm not terribly fond of the "TRACE" section and the "Server Changes" > section, as I think that they could be more-concise simply with a > reference to other documentation (namely the dbmail.conf "man" page), > but since they weren't a problem for me I've left them be. For the > most-part I feel that an UPGRADING document is there to highlight the > changes between this version and any previous version that may prove to > be problematic. I don't think that the details need to be documented > there as long as it is documented elsewhere. > > Thanks, > > Lee. > > > On 01/12/2015 02:55 AM, Harald Leithner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> good that you managed to upgrade! >> >> About the documentation, I'm pretty sure that Paul excepts every patch >> that makes the documentation more clear and better readable for all. >> >> Now you have fresh knowledge of the upgrade process, so it would be >> great if you write a new UPGRADING text file and share it with us. >> >> thx >> >> Harald >> >> >> Am .01.2015, 07:52 Uhr, schrieb Lee Howard <[email protected]>: >> >>> So after weeks of part-time work resolving dependency issues in the >>> upgrade (primarily with GMime and Glib, but libevent was also a minor >>> issue) this evening I upgraded from 3.0.2 to 3.2.2. >>> >>> I did make a backup of the database, but the schema auto-migration >>> appears to have worked, things are operational, and I do not notice >>> any ill effects with the database at this point. >>> >>> (I'm hoping that the efforts of this upgrade result in no more >>> situations where clients cannot connect to dbmail-imapd and >>> dbmail-pop3d services. Whether the problem was in dbmail or in GMime >>> or something else, I don't know. I didn't have any problems after >>> upgrading only GMime, but I didn't let dbmail-3.0.2 run long-enough >>> with GMime-2.6.20 to say. Normally I would see one problem every two >>> weeks or so, but lately it was more-frequent: like once per-week. I >>> only finished the GMime upgrade on Thursday.) >>> >>> I quickly hit-upon the dbmail-imapd segfault bug fixed here: >>> >>> https://github.com/pjstevns/dbmail/commit/edd6179d638d4257d0a669de582f8770370a7364 >>> >>> >>> So, I applied that patch, and it seems to have resolved the crashing >>> problem. >>> >>> Upgrade documentation is a concern for me, though... >>> >>> The UPGRADING document and the sample dbmail.conf file explain that >>> [dburi] has deprecated [driver], [host], [sqlport], [sqlsocket], >>> [user], [pass], and [db]. However, no examples are given and no >>> format syntax is provided. So, it leaves the user guessing. I'm >>> sure that database URIs are probably standard, and dbmail adheres to >>> this standard, but it's not stated. I just followed the example in >>> dbmail-3.2.2/jenkins/Makefile. >>> >>> A IMAP behavior change from default, login_disabled=no to yes, is not >>> discussed at all in UPGRADING. >>> >>> Lastly, the UPGRADING file contains unnecessary information noise. As >>> it is the user has to read the entire UPGRADING document and >>> determine which parts apply to their upgrade path. Since this is the >>> 3.2.2 tarball there is no need to explain the upgrade path to 3.0 as >>> long as you include the full 2.2-to-3.2 path in the explanation. >>> Nobody is downloading the 3.2.2 tarball in order to perform a >>> 2.2-to-3.0 upgrade.. That information is only relevant so that those >>> upgrading from 2.2 can try to discern what they need to do. It would >>> be clearer if the UPGRADING document did not expect the reader to >>> decipher the noise from the information and merely explain what users >>> of all previous versions of dbmail would need to do to upgrade and >>> maintain the same functional behavior. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Lee. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dbmail-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev >> >> > -- Harald Leithner ITronic Wiedner Hauptstraße 120/5.1, 1050 Wien, Austria Tel: +43-1-545 0 604 Fax: +43-1-786 23 88 26 Mobil: +43-699-123 78 4 78 Mail: [email protected] | itronic.at _______________________________________________ Dbmail-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev