Re: curmail_size vs innodb disk usage
Reindl Harald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.dbmail |
|---|---|
| Organization | the lounge interactive design |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 19.03.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Simon: > What im trying to understand is why is the SUM of curmail_size is approx > 110GB, yet the database size (even dump'ed) is 400GB. Surely dbmail does > not have that much overhead in its database? mailsize has barely to do with database size completly different worlds no database at all gives back space just because data are removed because the overhead would be way too large, be it mysql, berkely db, postgresql or something else - they all try to re-use allocated space as good as possible without vaccum all the time _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 181 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlULMhwACgkQhmBjz394AnkM5QCfROJyrVboKR4ZZfaJcCp2vwmb sm0AnjpykaKPqm0O0T8lT++k9s7NCyeJ =QMuq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----