Re: does dbmail mangle the position of return-path header?

Am 03.12.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> Thanks for the reference. You might try attached patch where I fix the
> generic set_header

does this patch apply to 3.1.17? since it's so silent here e hestitate 
to play around with dbmail-3.2 and currently no time anyways since 
working day and night on refactoring 250000 lines of code in a 13 years 
old base......

dbmail-3.1.17-3.fc24.20161014.rh.2874f497fb429ed139e94342ca1c84325b20b3f1.x86_64


BTW: it would also be nice when dbmail could stop reformat existing 
headers - spam reports are horrible to read - they are supposed to have 
* starting in a new line with a space before
___________________________________________________________

X-Spam-Report: Flag: No,	* -0.1 CUST_DNSWL_3_JEF_L RBL:
  hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com (Low Trust)	*      [216.34.181.88 listed in
  hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]	* -3.5 CUST_DNSWL_13_TL_H RBL:
  dnswl-aggregate.thelounge.net (High Trust)	*      [216.34.181.88 listed in
  dnswl-aggregate.thelounge.net]	* -0.5 CUST_DNSWL_11_ORG_H RBL:
  list.dnswl.org (High Trust)	*      [216.34.181.88 listed in 
list.dnswl.org]
	* -100 USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's SPF 
whitelist	*
  0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule	*
  0.0 CUST_SHORTCIRCUIT1 Skip tests based on whitelists/blacklists and	* 

  local relays
___________________________________________________________