Re: does dbmail mangle the position of return-path header?

Am 04.12.2016 um 10:54 schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> On 03-12-16 17:43, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 03.12.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Paul J Stevens:
>>> Thanks for the reference. You might try attached patch where I fix the
>>> generic set_header
>>
>> does this patch apply to 3.1.17? since it's so silent here e hestitate
>> to play around with dbmail-3.2 and currently no time anyways since
>> working day and night on refactoring 250000 lines of code in a 13 years
>> old base......
>>
>> dbmail-3.1.17-3.fc24.20161014.rh.2874f497fb429ed139e94342ca1c84325b20b3f1.x86_64
>
> I'm attaching the same patch for 3.1

thanks - that looks way better!

Return-Path: [email protected]
X-AT-Envelope-From: <[email protected]>
X-AT-Envelope-To: <[email protected]>
Received: from rh.thelounge.net (rh.thelounge.net [10.0.0.99])	(using 
TLSv1.2
	with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate 
requested)	(Authenticated sender: [email protected])
	by testserver.rhsoft.net (MTA) with ESMTPSA id 3tYZpH1jXzz28FV
	for <[email protected]>; Wed,  7 Dec 2016 11:43:03 +0100 (CET)
To: [email protected]

>> BTW: it would also be nice when dbmail could stop reformat existing
>> headers - spam reports are horrible to read - they are supposed to have
>> * starting in a new line with a space before
>
> I dunno. This is deep gmime stuff