Re: flatcurve index size (10x larger than lucene)
Jean-Daniel Beaubien via dovecot <[email protected]> Mon, 18 May 2026 17:45:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.dovecot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB962xw1zRqV7H6mz891QjTufwDQmuQn76N4RdLV7gyjZ9FoXw@mail.gmail.com> |
Thank you. Removing substring and revuilding the indexes worked. The size iscnow similar to lucene, and approx 8x smaller than with substring emabled. Speed also seems 20%-30% faster when querying the text or body of email. Thank you for the help. On Thu, May 14, 2026, 4:45 p.m. Aki Tuomi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 14/05/2026 23:21 EEST Jean-Daniel Beaubien via dovecot < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am currently trying to update from an old dovecot 2.3 setup with > > fts-lucene to 2.4.2 with fts-flatcurve. > > > > However, I am seeing a giant jump in the size of the indexes. > > > > For an email account that takes 12GB of storage, I get the following > index > > sizes: > > > > - lucene: 270 MB > > - flatcurve: 2400 MB > > > > > > That is almost a 10x increase in the index size (with flatcurve the > indexes > > represent 20% of the size of the mailbox). > > Hi! > > You have substring search enabled, that will incur a larger size as those > substrings need to be indexed somewhere. > > Aki > > _______________________________________________ dovecot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]