Re: [Imap-protocol] IMAP part numbering corner case
Timo Sirainen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17.8.2012, at 7.17, Philip Guenther wrote: >> >> [Outlook, I'm pretty sure, but it doesn't implement ID]: >> BODY[TEXT]: The entire inner message >> BODY[1]: The entire inner message >> BODY[1.1]: NIL > > This violates this paragraph from RFC 3501, page 55: > A part of type MESSAGE/RFC822 also has nested part numbers, > referring to parts of the MESSAGE part's body. > > ...which when combined with the first quote above, means that "1.1" should > be a valid specifier for the inner message's content. Is it valid? 1.1 makes sense when it's a multipart, in which case it refers to the first MIME part, but is it valid when ther's no multipart? Looks like UW-IMAP allows it, but not 1.1.1, so maybe it was meant to be valid. I could add it to my tests.. _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol