Re: [Imap-protocol] Comparators?
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Timo, On 10/09/2012 17:33, Timo Sirainen wrote: > http://www.iana.org/assignments/collation/collation-index.html > > Looks like there aren't many comparators. I guess there aren't any other such lists either by other organizations? I am not aware of any. The only other comparator which is not registered that was discussed recently is a numeric one which can also handle negative integers. > I'm mainly wondering how to add support for languages where the acutes/graves in letters should be ignored by searches. If you write it down, I will review and can find other reviewers. I don't think this is the first time this was proposed, so maybe there is some utility in it. > I guess I could simply add some kludgy setting for that, but then I shouldn't be advertising I18NLEVEL=1 anymore, because i;unicode-casemap is no longer being used as the default comparator.. > > Also full text search indexes make the matter of changing comparators or using multiple comparators more-or-less impossible. Of course I18NLEVEL=2 requires that i;unicode-casemap must be one of the available comparators, so I couldn't advertise that either. _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol