Re: [Imap-protocol] Re: Suspend/Restore feature proposal
Michael M Slusarz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20121127124811.Horde.VuMexjqX6lKpL2uX-qPgPw2@bigworm.curecanti.org> |
Quoting Bron Gondwana <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012, at 02:48 AM, Michael M Slusarz wrote: >> (full >> disclosure: the recent Cyrus break is weird because it sent a BYE and >> terminated instead of a failed command, so that wasn't previously >> scanned for so we weren't catching this until recently. so we're not >> perfect either.). > > I'm kinda embarassed about this one! I forgot to put the GUID calculation > call in the APPEND BINARY path, because nothing ever tested it and it > appeared nobody was using it, because we didn't have a single complaint or > failure with it until just a few weeks ago. There's probably some deeper (sad) IMAP implementation story to be learned here. RFC 3516 was published April 2003, and 9 years later we're the first one to ever use literal8's in an APPEND? michael _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol