Re: [Imap-protocol] Combining LITERAL+ and BINARY
Timo Sirainen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28.11.2012, at 1.59, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> On 2012-11-27, at 3:35 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> It's not defined, so I don't think clients can legally use their
>> combination.. Although Dovecot supports the obvious way of combining
>> them: ~{n+}
>
> And I consider that a legitimate operation.
>
> I'm planning to push an updated BINARY RFC, and I'll make sure this case is called out.
Nice. I noticed several other ambiguous issues when I implemented it a few months ago. I think I sent a mail about all of them to the IMAP mailing lists..
_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol