Re: [Imap-protocol] Re: BINARY for broken MIME parts
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/12/2012 11:55, Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 07:16:35 CEST, Brandon Long wrote: >> I would think [PARSE] would be more appropriate than UNKNOWN-CTE. Or >> just stick with [ALERT]. > > ALERT is reserved for situations which MUST be communicated to the > user. If the IMAP server cannot decode a particular CTE, another > response code shall be used -- this is a condition where the client > shall make its decision on how to proceed, but definitely not by > showing an ALERT to the user. > > Please, don't use ALERT for this. +1. _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol