Re: [Imap-protocol] Re: Missing UIDNEXT during mailbox synchronization
Michael M Slusarz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20130106223402.Horde.ZSCj1mxY7M87XW6Ro4AX9A1@bigworm.curecanti.org> |
Quoting Jan Kundrát <[email protected]>: > Looks like that part of 3501 was not updated from 2060, then -- the > UIDNEXT is listed as REQUIRED in the description of the SELECT > command, as Bron pointed out. I reported this as an errata to RFC 3501, with the recommendation that the "assumption" sentence from the UIDNEXT text be removed in order to eliminate the ambiguity between this text (which implies that the UIDNEXT response may be optional) and the REQUIRED requirement located in Sections 6.3.1 & 6.3.2. michael _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol