Re: [Imap-protocol] Courier bug(?)
Dave Cridland <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKHUCzwJ8xq7O8vGDHe0D9Jviac06o-QtePMhKYV7HzwzRPMPA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 21 Jan 2013 21:50, "Michael M Slusarz" <[email protected]> wrote: > OR... is the fact that this is a FLAGS response unattached to the given UID query mean that this is OK? In other words... since FLAGS wasn't explicitly requested by the FETCH command, is this untagged response legal as a unilateral flag change response sent by the server, regardless of the fact that it appears during an active UID command? This doesn't seem correct, and it can be argued that the BODY[HEADER] access itself "caused" the FLAGS FETCH response anyway. Right, this is indeed a unilaterally sent FETCH, and it wasn't really caused by the other FETCH - it's just been batched until a command was in progress. Or maybe it just happens to have been sent at the same time. In practise, it's likely that the IMAP server explicitly checked flag changes when it received the FETCH, but that's an implementation detail. In any case, I don't think this is a bug. Dave. _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol