Re: [Imap-protocol] Clarification on RFC 6851
Stuart Brandt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the good discussion. The scenario we're looking to cover is indeed the case Timo hit on - non-recoverable failure of some system component while processing an excessively large set of ids. I'll keep monitoring to see if more clarify comes, but for now we're going to proceed with the approach Dave outlined below. - Stuart On 2/8/13 4:16 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: > My take: > > Say NO if no messages were moved. (For whatever reason). > > Say OK if some were. (Typically all extant messages in the range). > > Rationale: You need to put in response codes in various places; it's not > clear to me you can put a HIGHESTMODSEQ in a NO response. > _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol