Re: [Imap-protocol] Error in RFC 4551 (CONDSTORE)??
Pete Maclean <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 10:21 AM 3/5/2013, Barry Leiba wrote: > >> Quoting Pete Maclean <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> It seems to me that there is an error in Example 5 of section 3.2. It > >>> reads: > >>> > >>> C: c101 STORE 1 (UNCHANGEDSINCE 12121230045) -FLAGS.SILENT > >>> (\Deleted) > >>> S: * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 12111230047] > >>> S: * 50 FETCH (MODSEQ (12111230048)) > >>> S: c101 OK Store (conditional) completed > >>> > >>> Surely the message index in the first line (1) should match that in the > >>> third line (50). > >> > >> I think you are correct. The '* 50' response has to relate-back to the > >> original request since the conditional store was successful (no MODIFIED > >> response-code was returned) and successful conditional stores MUST return > >> the FETCH (MODSEQ) data for every message that was changed. > > > > You are right, it should be either "STORE 50 ..." or "* 1 FETCH ...". > >I suggest "STORE 50", just to avoid making anyone think that "1" is special. > >Pete, will you submit an errata report, please?: >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php Good. I had the same idea about "STORE 50" and yes, I will submit a report. Pete Maclean _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol