Re: [Imap-protocol] Working around the evils of LITERAL+
Timo Sirainen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27.3.2013, at 22.33, Brandon Long <[email protected]> wrote: > a append inbox {60000000} > a BAD [ALERT] Message too large. http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=8770 NO, not BAD. Client didn't do anything syntactically wrong. > Which goes to that other issue between the updated responses codes not being backward compatible with ALERT... which I guess I can just ignore since most clients ignore ALERT anyways. * NO [ALERT] Message too large. http://... a NO [MAXSIZE 123456] Too large. Or vice versa. _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol