Re: [Imap-protocol] UW-IMAPD and its interpretation of ESEARCH

On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 01:39:00 -0500, Bron Gondwana wrote:
| 
| I think in Jan's case as a client author, there's often a limited amount
| that you can do to get servers fixed.  Sure this path will lead to the
| bugfixes appearing sometime in the next 2-3 years once it gets accepted
| upstream, packaged by distributions, and finally slipstreamed onto
| everyone's servers in the next round of stable updates.

Oh, of course.  Sorry, I didn't pick up the clue that Jan was a client
author.

| Even as a server author, you wouldn't believe the resistance to updates.
| "it's not in Debian stable, we're not using it".  So plenty of my 2 year
| old Cyrus bugs are still out there in the real world.  Unless it's a
| security issue, good luck getting it fixed quickly.
| 
| Hence: workarounds.

Right.  Nonetheless, I'd like to get it fixed in Panda if it's a
problem there.  For my local users, if nothing else.

 Jon

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Abbey 				              [email protected]
Applied Research Laboratories                 The University of Texas at Austin
GPG Key: 71767586 at keyserver pgp.mit.edu, http://www.ganymeta.org/workkey.gpg

_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlGy02sACgkQGI9EwHF2dYaVLQCgvdccsSWcQyEwVWMIMuh8kPf2
01wAoLBVwfpl6r3fmB+mFbyAjDylNktr
=nfaK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----