Re: [Imap-protocol] Multiple non-waiting UID SEARCH commands
Barry Leiba <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC4RtVDtTBK6EOGtqJNkCQewgc-ZpMMOMq=046j+Umh6H6imvA@mail.gmail.com> |
>> But this should be fine as long as I can rely on the order of the untagged >> responses. So my questions are: >> >> 1. Is my interpretation correct that the above commands are valid according >> to the RFC? >> >> 2. Do you know of any servers that don't respond in the order of the >> commands? > > Servers should not reorder responses to such commands or they will be in > violation of RFC 3501. So yes, you can rely on the order. Really? Can you show us where in 3501 it's required that untagged responses be in any particular order? I don't think it does. Barry _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol