Re: [Imap-protocol] Mac OS 10.9 particularly buggy implementation of IMAP
Michael Grinich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAO3aFYtjUT4=08VVB2H1jiQJU0Wnhrj9OM6E5ZT0PEC+tsPNRw@mail.gmail.com> |
Have you seen the 2-million-message-copy behavior on multiple users? That seems like a bug that might be related to some weird rules, or perhaps a buggy migration of rules from 10.8 to 10.9. >From talking to people at Apple, literally the *best* way to get stuff like this fixed is to file bug reports on BugReporter<http://bugreporter.apple.com>. After that, please post the issue to OpenRadar<http://www.openradar.me/page/1> so others can see it. For your users that actively report problems, you can send them some boilerplate to also submit a bug, and include the original bug number so it can be marked as a dupe. On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]>wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:10:18PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > (there's another interesting pattern, it appears to send the 'D' of > > 'DONE' in a separate packet when finishing IDLE... no idea why. I've > > never seen DONE split over two reads before) > > Two possibilities: > > 1. It's a neat hack to learn whether a middlebox has killed the > connection. > > 2. They're sending the D, O and N separately to extend NAT timeouts. > > Arnt > _______________________________________________ > Imap-protocol mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol > _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol