Re: [Imap-protocol] STARTTLS after PREAUTH
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Michael, > On 19 Mar 2014, at 18:59, Michael M Slusarz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Quoting Tony Finch <[email protected]>: > >> Bron Gondwana <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014, at 08:25 AM, Michael M Slusarz wrote: >>> > >>> > STARTTLS deprecated the use of port 993, which isn't an official IMAP >>> > port FWIW. >> >> What do you mean by "official"? Have you seen RFC 6186? > > Nothing in there registering 993 to IMAP. RFC 6335 registry agrees that it hasn't been "officially" reserved: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=imaps > > But this is just arguing semantics. Real-world: 993 (& 995) have universal knowledge as to their current use. I think IETF UTA WG is going to register them properly. > michael > A > > _______________________________________________ > Imap-protocol mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol