Re: [Imap-protocol] IMAP SUBMIT Extension, take two
Jan Kundrát <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 19:48:51 CEST, Bron Gondwana wrote: > But now we're proposing a state transition from "UNSENT" to "SENT" - and I > strongly believe that rates a readable change on the server, either a flag > or a standard annotation name. All I think it needs is a transition from > "no flag present" to "\Sent" flag present, or $Sent if \Sent is considered > too impossible to add at this stage of the game. Any particular reason why sticking with $Submitted [1] is not OK? [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5550#section-5.10 -- Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/ _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol