Re: [Imap-protocol] Creating subfolders in Gmail
Jeff McKay <[email protected]> Tue, 27 May 2014 13:22:12 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It is the second case I am trying to implement, where in the UI, I can
see bar nested under foo. That does not appear to work
as you stated. Here is the trace of me creating two folders:
<send 24>A103 CREATE "Migrated"
<recv 17>A103 OK Success
<send 43>A104 CREATE "Migrated/BUDGET CALCULATION"
<recv 17>A104 OK Success
<send 89>A001 APPEND "Migrated/BUDGET CALCULATION" (\Seen) "18-Apr-2014
09:49:00 -0700" {135007}
<recv 12>+ go ahead
When I get a new list, I see this:
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Migrated"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Migrated/BUDGET CALCULATION"
So it would have appeared to work, but, the UI displays only
"Migrated/BUDGET CALCULATION". There is also another
label called "[IMAP]/Migrated" with nothing in it.
On 5/27/2014 12:40 PM, Jamie Nicolson (倪志明) wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by "single top level folder". "foo/bar" has
> the hierarchy delimiter in it, so from IMAP's point of view it is a
> nested folder.
>
> If you want to be able to store messages in "foo/bar", but not "foo",
> you can CREATE foo/ and then CREATE foo/bar. The first CREATE will be
> a no-op on Gmail, but will succeed with OK. The second CREATE will
> result in this folder layout:
>
> * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "foo"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "foo/bar"
>
> Now you can COPY and APPEND messages to foo/bar. If you also want to
> be able to store messages directly in foo, you just have to CREATE foo
> (without the hierarchy delimiter suffix). You can do this before or
> after creating "foo/bar". Then you'll have this:
>
> * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "foo"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "foo/bar"
>
> The web UI displays these two cases differently. In the first case
> (where foo/bar is selectable but foo is \Noselect), we show "foo/bar"
> as a standalone label. In the second case (where foo/bar and foo are
> both selectable folders), we display bar nested under foo. This is
> just a quirk of the web UI.
>
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jeff McKay <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Yes that is what I get also, sorry for misstating the error
> message. I am still unclear though about how to create a folder
> with a sub-folder. You said that the correct syntax should be:
>
> CREATE "foo/bar"
>
> which creates a single top level folder called "foo/bar". I know
> that you want to support being able to create folder names
> that contain the hierarchy delimiter, but there seems to be a
> conflict here.
>
>
> On 5/27/2014 11:09 AM, Jamie Nicolson (倪志明) wrote:
>> I don't see any error message in the Gmail code for "hierarchy
>> character ignored". When I try to reproduce this, I see something
>> different:
>>
>> a create foo/
>> a OK [CANNOT] Ignoring hierarchy declaration (Success)
>>
>> This seems to follow 6.3.3.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:09 PM, David Harris
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> On 23 May 2014 at 18:03, Jeff McKay wrote:
>>
>> > Has something changed with how Gmail handles the hierarchy
>> character
>> > in the CREATE command? I am sure I had this working at one
>> point, but
>> > now:
>> >
>> > CREATE "TopLevelFolder/"
>> >
>> > generates "NO hierarchy character ignored"
>>
>> The server would appear to be in error. See RFC3501, section
>> 6.3.3 ("The
>> Create Command"):
>>
>> If the mailbox name is suffixed with the server's hierarchy
>> separator character (as returned from the server by a LIST
>> command), this is a declaration that the client intends
>> to create
>> mailbox names under this name in the hierarchy. Server
>> implementations that do not require this declaration
>> MUST ignore
>> the declaration. In any case, the name created is
>> without the
>> trailing hierarchy delimiter.
>>
>> This seems pretty unambiguous to me, but no doubt there's an
>> alternative
>> reading I haven't considered (there usually is). I assume
>> GMail actually
>> *does* support submailboxes (I don't personally use it)?
>>
>> Interestingly, the example for section 6.3.3 is an almost
>> exact match to your
>> report:
>>
>> Example:
>> C: A003 CREATE owatagusiam/
>> S: A003 OK CREATE completed
>>
>> Note that there is a reverse condition to this where a server
>> may report a
>> mailbox with a trailing hierarchy delimiter as part of a LIST
>> response; I
>> confess I've never understood exactly what that means
>> (Exchange used to
>> do it and may still do so) - Mark Crispin once explained it
>> to me as having
>> some meaning related to a test for existence, but I couldn't
>> grasp what he
>> meant.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> -- David --
>>
>> ------------------ David Harris -+- Pegasus Mail
>> ----------------------
>> Box 5451, Dunedin, New Zealand | e-mail:
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Phone: +64 3 453-6880 <tel:%2B64%203%20453-6880> |
>> Fax: +64 3 453-6612 <tel:%2B64%203%20453-6612>
>>
>> Real newspaper headlines from U.S. papers:
>> TRAFFIC DEAD RISE SLOWLY
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Imap-protocol mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Imap-protocol mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imap-protocol mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
>
>
_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol