[Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?

Ladar Levison <[email protected]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 06:14:12 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.mail.imap.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I thought this might be a good list to ask a simple, but admittedly
subjective question: If Mark Crispin was creating IMAP from scratch, in
the world of today, would it still be a line based protocol like it was
with RFC3501, or would he have gone with something more stateless, like
a JSON-RPC paradigm, like JMAP?

For quick reference:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501

Or JMAP:

http://jmap.io/spec.html

Or my own bastardized protocol used for webmail to server access, which
I created a few years back:

https://github.com/lavabit/magma.classic/raw/master/docs/magma.web.api.pdf

L~

_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU+uuUAAoJEMR5kTl8dRp/Qt8P/25wobU0p/wvP9JpnAmA8ERT
fPoh5cAC/V0mQX5fbe/TREFWVgvnEpPdqcPNL8FpMI5BiVNGebUKL5Mv+G/jIEK7
s9vOB0i26fh14b8jnHMKZIotVuFmEJ7DiZGNMuBpfgRevb5M9LCoGyjemrojsEf8
jlBYUkJYLJuTsqIeIwokfWEUej/DWBtQZkxfnBazTbGafygyd20JE+4o0Img8g7z
9wIsoqgHdEMEbQ1h/XVjimtYORO6qX8a3OtOiN+HqgWZkyUyg+VB3SlKZAIEm+DC
m512m3MxuFM7Sqm5EjUf3FaHqL0THSjhougEvlS/i+7DMznEjXk9oPQKS9b7ZAtB
3sSXqRNSMSUYskY9qbbkW1NY2/N1YoSr2Jc03SeDqyjQgJXEbWzLN1mQsyjAHZO5
iHy+kW578iBFh5qJSVzdJLVqSFZKqDH3RjvBJ7B8uRVxdScBpsROwJAf1Wd8Y4fS
Qm8mTNMhbLzhsTKpE/MJ35ZlnRXncROQ9Oiva7TEwtJncl6Gnzut3F4/LYPu1W3R
GYMpOVrxOdGdt8h32GZI+Pj41VKzWyxEKvAnFBn2McGm0TByDD01+r+Px2a8ZGaa
xW+zFlThSVgw1+0U8gR5bTxESGmqWekkUl7+e/mLxVaZP5V+gl4kChSIllJk3HfJ
JvmdA2pkBgJyVOZ9qoyb
=ydFZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----