[Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Ladar Levison <[email protected]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 06:14:12 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I thought this might be a good list to ask a simple, but admittedly subjective question: If Mark Crispin was creating IMAP from scratch, in the world of today, would it still be a line based protocol like it was with RFC3501, or would he have gone with something more stateless, like a JSON-RPC paradigm, like JMAP? For quick reference: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501 Or JMAP: http://jmap.io/spec.html Or my own bastardized protocol used for webmail to server access, which I created a few years back: https://github.com/lavabit/magma.classic/raw/master/docs/magma.web.api.pdf L~ _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU+uuUAAoJEMR5kTl8dRp/Qt8P/25wobU0p/wvP9JpnAmA8ERT fPoh5cAC/V0mQX5fbe/TREFWVgvnEpPdqcPNL8FpMI5BiVNGebUKL5Mv+G/jIEK7 s9vOB0i26fh14b8jnHMKZIotVuFmEJ7DiZGNMuBpfgRevb5M9LCoGyjemrojsEf8 jlBYUkJYLJuTsqIeIwokfWEUej/DWBtQZkxfnBazTbGafygyd20JE+4o0Img8g7z 9wIsoqgHdEMEbQ1h/XVjimtYORO6qX8a3OtOiN+HqgWZkyUyg+VB3SlKZAIEm+DC m512m3MxuFM7Sqm5EjUf3FaHqL0THSjhougEvlS/i+7DMznEjXk9oPQKS9b7ZAtB 3sSXqRNSMSUYskY9qbbkW1NY2/N1YoSr2Jc03SeDqyjQgJXEbWzLN1mQsyjAHZO5 iHy+kW578iBFh5qJSVzdJLVqSFZKqDH3RjvBJ7B8uRVxdScBpsROwJAf1Wd8Y4fS Qm8mTNMhbLzhsTKpE/MJ35ZlnRXncROQ9Oiva7TEwtJncl6Gnzut3F4/LYPu1W3R GYMpOVrxOdGdt8h32GZI+Pj41VKzWyxEKvAnFBn2McGm0TByDD01+r+Px2a8ZGaa xW+zFlThSVgw1+0U8gR5bTxESGmqWekkUl7+e/mLxVaZP5V+gl4kChSIllJk3HfJ JvmdA2pkBgJyVOZ9qoyb =ydFZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----