Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
John Snow <[email protected]> Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:36:36 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If he were around, this question would have started a fun argument. I miss that guy. snow. On 3/7/2015 7:14 AM, Ladar Levison wrote: > I thought this might be a good list to ask a simple, but admittedly > subjective question: If Mark Crispin was creating IMAP from scratch, in > the world of today, would it still be a line based protocol like it was > with RFC3501, or would he have gone with something more stateless, like > a JSON-RPC paradigm, like JMAP? > > For quick reference: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3501 > > Or JMAP: > > http://jmap.io/spec.html > > Or my own bastardized protocol used for webmail to server access, which > I created a few years back: > > https://github.com/lavabit/magma.classic/raw/master/docs/magma.web.api.pdf > > L~ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Imap-protocol mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol