Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Joel Reicher <[email protected]> Sun, 08 Mar 2015 15:12:58 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I thought this might be a good list to ask a simple, but admittedly > subjective question: If Mark Crispin was creating IMAP from scratch, in > the world of today, would it still be a line based protocol like it was > with RFC3501, or would he have gone with something more stateless, like > a JSON-RPC paradigm, like JMAP? In addition to mail-specific aspects, something like IMAP needs to solve the problem of (concurrent) access to remote storage (over a network). Looking at current solutions to that problem in its generic form may suggest stateful is the way to go. (In particular the evolution of NFS.) Regards, - Joel _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol