Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:59:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 9, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Imants Cekusins <[email protected]> wrote: > Current standards (i.e. case insensitive commands, mixture of > encodings within a single text block, injection of CRLF which is not > part of the text), complicate interpreting a lot. It also consumes a > lot of CPU resources - visibly. Is your measurement data and methodology for this available online anywhere? _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 801 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU/iXHAAoJEG8PnXiV/JnUI3YQAIF/mItFwj3+2aR6NXaTyVl9 jyzZY1CfKl6SU89KqaEgzEiurCULF+/Iz8NMXwNee75ajM36AO6T5Pdq94oGAJm9 TAv4YBpNSjyhvIw0FZB8fzDTKEF8Au+yypBrepLDgCnb6NaELGS1F2pT2UJ4yRes 8LOpqs02Wd7LA55NQqxmM8nx4jdUmAIgZqQoIqU/iIfHJFxUg7UuQ26PrUY9UMYR sK51tpiyUNUkW7wi8YvFV/ZZeC0htYPhI2h3xHJzgdZ9HzzOww0ptqyhuXOjpqE7 eGSWdJU9LpkisJrcnlq87maApzBX6SV3oOFdZeWRStbgzImYVRd2/q41mox/WhRb OaXF8hb8jWUWwqfPUTwSMKQTNUdUWr+i6laxeP3/tYcgxM8vqpfuDeQeKXUxg4yJ mI5UamzQl3h2oXNosrqrG7AK6P9JMBxR+1faXRwea86xuAXEwTnZ3n8nBozzA5bD lX60SiG2kEgQRPIe2H5bPkIVqX7ldK1uOPwh2ccV3yLXWNU9bunMra0Fc8uHfC8z lURidnNljF9qHK/3+/fpphTW0v5XcU+iB1m8kTx3VyV/BJ303KUp0uUMH6CKGjMk jELZULtnhbbHpi2Ty5ciQFnFfMK3FDXZni87JPQa9B3nFCWfu9ZE59BoQr9uYHun N4XVhoFl2UMu7FJHX/sD =jrnb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----