Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Imants Cekusins <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:15:12 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP1qinaEv5ZOC0rpXWdHhE=phLW5=6iWkiseb715-hZ6b85A4A@mail.gmail.com> |
> text protocol is neglectable in term of CPU usage ..., compare to let's say indexing of emails for search. well indexing is another topic. business email servers may or may not index email. of course, there is virus scanning, spam filtering - all this consumes resources. all I am saying: current protocols are wasteful from several points of view and can be simplified. if anything, simpler protocols would lead to - fewer production issues, - shorter development time (for email server developers), - more email server implementations, (choice is good) - better protocol compliance (simpler protocol makes it easier to comply with). - more robust mail delivery (less confusion over protocol) _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol