Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Mar 2015 18:19:50 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 9, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Imants Cekusins <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is your measurement data and methodology for this available online anywhere? > > this is a subjective assessment. Email servers are way too busy for > what they deliver. I believe No, it's not. Everything you are claiming can be measured. No belief required. Do you have measurements to back up your claim? I don't discount it out of hand, but if you can't back it up with proof, I won't believe it. _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 801 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU/ka2AAoJEG8PnXiV/JnUrH0QAI2pqlu4MyYlEb4zhPrXx+lg lClFRGmF+/t9MY0mPfErAF2v5hHv7b+NAGctwE57SHGBVjRMPjHvHln42cE8UClW eZ+gcyH13mZOes8VYD5u58vHKD4d3EuNkgnpKUwNnTgMx2j/NYrp52HWMUvSKRJi SGKth4KCmfHFBD75wiylgAqRxT4gW0ZKy3zzK0ZimM4hWxkSVAsMTcJw9L1r+Fhs r07/GUXe3zgN7gFnko7/ABtjvaOecZWN9VZtFCSXwwH4hkc+g/EMgzYVJZ0OyH4V KFz1XevqnlYW8kTK8KRnj2MKOrD72QWXTqnB5DM1yCVpJFA6+La+Mks4T3EEXFaW 7bwOoqSVBenCGYdOY88NZ2Vmce+J+bdjSGc4xwBEMsCh3tTzx/4DvFkinxsiXSW5 I9HY5GVDDQmwSJfW//ZgEOjFrzZLJ+0c9CO7POis/D1pPzvp76WnI/eRz/vGygad 788Y2+XosABHDnuqQnquohplfKjuKQsiU3tQnzgFdWoIDTeQ0I18SuDpZ/g/vgWG xvUHtiRwNAEL0QOxFbm53fIOqXxy0otpjlVhrwnkiL2FB2vnanMSQSM0p/p0RMdx CjkOFY4707dvXFBp188xIE67OklbyoiYdbdR//lgp8o4DQ0LThcdO4nzqKNKnB7q 6PR0siT3TxsHmLWaz2Xm =+Lwp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----