Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Imants Cekusins <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:29:50 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP1qinat-aNSnNgTm+fJyftapwU9RGno=B5z9RVy9T1gA6C97A@mail.gmail.com> |
> benchmarking a recent version of one of the popular Linux mail servers at first (perhaps Postfix with Dovecot or Cyrus) I tried to set up and configure this exact combination for virtual hosting. It took me a long time and in the end I gave up. Yes, I understand someone somewhere succeeded to configure it. My point is not that it is impossible to set it up. My point (well, other than speed, robustness & simplicity) is that with simplifed protocols though we could have more servers, a choice between servers & configurations, supporting multitude of storage backends. Wouldn't it be nice - to choose? eh? _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol