Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
"Hoa V. Dinh" <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:17:24 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Please stop feeding the troll. There are performance issues. I think your knowledge on emails protocols and standards are lacking a little bit to point out the accurate issues. Please do some homework before trying to come up with a solution. -- Hoa V. Dinh On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Imants Cekusins wrote: > so, to summarize majority opinion: > > IMAP & SMTP in their current state: > - are efficient > - lead to efficient hardware utilization > - are simple enough for implementation > > changes to the protocols are not justified > > current selection of email server software offers enough choice. there > is no real need for more alternatives > > ? > _______________________________________________ > Imap-protocol mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol > > _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol