Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?

"Hoa V. Dinh" <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:17:24 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.mail.imap.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Please stop feeding the troll. 

There are performance issues. I think your knowledge on emails protocols and standards are lacking a little bit to point out the accurate issues. Please do some homework before trying to come up with a solution.

-- 
Hoa V. Dinh


On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Imants Cekusins wrote:

> so, to summarize majority opinion:
> 
> IMAP & SMTP in their current state:
> - are efficient
> - lead to efficient hardware utilization
> - are simple enough for implementation
> 
> changes to the protocols are not justified
> 
> current selection of email server software offers enough choice. there
> is no real need for more alternatives
> 
> ?
> _______________________________________________
> Imap-protocol mailing list
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol