Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?

Bart Schaefer <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:27:02 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.mail.imap.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mar 10,  7:23pm, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
}
} I miss the cranky bastard, with his guns and politics and libertarian
} take on life :-) We were polar opposites on the first two of those
} three (maybe all of them), but he respected what you had to say, even
} as he let loose with how he thought you were a complete idiot and did
} not deserve to grace a keyboard with your fingers :-)

Back when I was still writing email client software, my colleagues and I
all had business cards printed up with "job titles" based on something
Mark had said to us on the mailing list.  I felt strangely honored to
have been referred to as a "Serious Threat" (to the integrity of the
IMAP protocol) just for some comment I made; I don't even recall what.
One of my colleagues was "Pedantic Crank" for pointing out something
inconsistent in the IMAP4 grammar.

Ah, those were the days.
_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol