Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Bart Schaefer <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:27:02 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 10, 7:23pm, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: } } I miss the cranky bastard, with his guns and politics and libertarian } take on life :-) We were polar opposites on the first two of those } three (maybe all of them), but he respected what you had to say, even } as he let loose with how he thought you were a complete idiot and did } not deserve to grace a keyboard with your fingers :-) Back when I was still writing email client software, my colleagues and I all had business cards printed up with "job titles" based on something Mark had said to us on the mailing list. I felt strangely honored to have been referred to as a "Serious Threat" (to the integrity of the IMAP protocol) just for some comment I made; I don't even recall what. One of my colleagues was "Pedantic Crank" for pointing out something inconsistent in the IMAP4 grammar. Ah, those were the days. _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol