Re: [Imap-protocol] Is OpenEmailSurvey open to share method or code?
Bron Gondwana <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:01:44 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1427252504.1020832.244866921.0886703A@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015, at 01:51 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Bron Gondwana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Of these, a bunch are non-standard / never been standardised. > > Yes, I noticed. But there are still a butt-load of RFC extensions that deserve review, I think. Honestly the simplest thing is what was discussed years ago on the imap5 list, just picking all the ones which really matter and get significant use, bunding them behind "IMAP5" and replacing all the other capabilities with just IMAP5. It has the plus sides of: a) shorter capability strings b) a base standard of stuff you have to support to be allowed to claim to be IMAP5 (I would include QRESYNC in that though, or go back and address the expunged hole in condstore) Bron. -- Bron Gondwana [email protected] _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol