Re: [Imap-protocol] Is OpenEmailSurvey open to share method or code?
Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:13:26 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 24, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Bron Gondwana <[email protected]> wrote: > Honestly the simplest thing is what was discussed years ago on the imap5 list, just picking > all the ones which really matter and get significant use, bunding them behind "IMAP5" and > replacing all the other capabilities with just IMAP5. But that resets the whole standards track progression. I would rather we marked the unused extensions as Historic, then cleaned up the bugs in the rest and moved the whole mess forwards towards actual Standard status. We certainly have enough implementation and interop experience to make this viable. Proposing an IMAP5 would just let loose a bucket of snakes that would never get herded back into any sort of container. --lyndon _______________________________________________ Imap-protocol mailing list [email protected] http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 801 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVEjXmAAoJEG8PnXiV/JnUH6AP/1p7mLWcn1TGGANs6LDmw2Lw hn7DMXyomkGeCMDf1guT8Mewmadvp9yD94m6Cfm0dzT6PXI4wCKtn23uRjUTVL6b sy6rVJAV7VCNcGCHmWQSwmZ8bmTrGPUjVCtS5rHTGaXRfmjfp1UxhnEJVX7p74jq YKLizMJDLQcFGFQUFnJZvMTi4WbyyTLpmF/sNnUGi6IUn7edDzTDPG9PU02v8sew /2Q+y2GumG5XUoaViRZNOkp3S4fTm+KpO55rCB0m7AhMjeyYcVHz5VLmdYEWo/+g wepojtHw2io8aDgUs4Gl5vgxfWN52A9WSSNq8LrlMqilS509eVHiupSitUM2kXC2 wM7Z1v7CMceDNLl5NMfbd/okhGsQdB17RyecTnP2l8x/yhKSfykX6rOY33RH47cG ZgHIC9B1JiKek2RUxZaWjuD981/ZC3dsB/IY5U6gDRRB8gdpvhYksaG0KUvkYWC3 y6XE+xZwWsrBt2RT37lXkc1BvbvedTsnlb/r7N5o6j2uH5d3dqFCFJNUw9b4Qu7p 5F9xZSnP1QbpvAAwbaQNVPso9ATDSf4gf31bm0f8DIioidKPMhifQDxKCecFR4ch xWTWMufA9BKgL4YDRJnTzgxeLeKk9DFoTKJb7vS6I1k257RyUg/4HLqbMR3WPkO3 a/fV5BWqP/aIOOG9yNeN =vE64 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----