Re: [PATCH] remove usage of tmpnam() in ssl_unix.c

Andrew Laurence <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.imap.uw.c-client
Message-ID <p06240808c6aba8e574fb@[128.200.62.106]>
At 4:10 PM -0700 8/14/09, Mark Crispin wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Andrew Laurence wrote:
>>One ponders, how simpler could UW/Panda become if support for 
>>ancient systems were swept aside?
>
>Not much, compared to the vast simplicity that would be achieved if 
>every SVR4 system -- particularly Solaris -- were to be exterminated.
>
>At least the death warrant was signed for Tru64 nee OSF/1.
>
>BSD and Linux are now close enough that their differences don't 
>matter to most programmers.  SVR4 is a true disaster of 
>incompatibility.

What about the mailbox formats?  Are there things which could proceed 
much more smoothly if support for "X" were dropped?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.